Sources tell us that the infamous Net Knickers Lurkers blog will shortly publish an exclusive new "list" from David Farrant. "If you think I can't be controversial, just watch!" commented the author. The article content - of which Net Knickers has promised to "publish unabridged" - is rumoured to place the bonky bishop in a most unflattering light.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Farrant Plans "Major Revelations" On Other Blog
Sources tell us that the infamous Net Knickers Lurkers blog will shortly publish an exclusive new "list" from David Farrant. "If you think I can't be controversial, just watch!" commented the author. The article content - of which Net Knickers has promised to "publish unabridged" - is rumoured to place the bonky bishop in a most unflattering light.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
And the purpose of this exercise?
You and yours offer Farrant a platform to post abuse and lies about his arch-nemesis Seán Manchester. Farrant naturally accommodates you because what else does he have in his life?
What a surprise!
Farrant has been doing the same thing for four decades. Who do you imagine takes a blind bit of notice of these repetitive rants? We've heard it all a thousand times before. The trouble is for Farrant he cannot always remember what he has previously "revealed" and frequently contradicts himself as one lie cancels out another. Such is the lot of a compulsive falsifier of facts.
Trying to get Farrant to substantiate his malicious allegations with hard evidence, however, is quite something else.
It simply won't happen.
Like you provided evidence that a vampire was staked and cremated before being 'consigned to the 'Bottomless Pit'? No evidence ws ever produced here except one faked photograph.
Like you provided evidence of another female 'vampire' was staked after turning into a 'giant spider?. That has never happened either.
Like y6ou provided evidence of having permission to illegally enter a vault in Highgate Cemetery when Bonky wrenche3d the lid off a coffin? still waiting for that!
And like Bonky provided evidence that he was really descended from Lord Byron and King james the 1st of England. (Andclaims that Mrs Bonky is descended from Charles 11?)
Still waiting for this as well!
Give it a rest Demonologist
Nobody, but nobody. believes you!
David Farrant
Like Farrant provided evidence that he saw a seven foot hovering spectre with glaring red eyes which "looked like it had been dead for a long time"?
Like Farrant provided evidence that he was ever anything to do with the British Occult Society beyond his own say-so?
Like a single member of Farrant's non-existent societies has ever been identified or has come forward? Where are his "members" when he opens forums and message boards in the name of his societies? They never manifest because they do not exist.
Why does Farrant even bother to keep up his charade when the evidence exposing his attempt to hoax a ghost story at the beginning of 1970 is so overwhelming?
There are witnesses. Plenty of them. They can still remember Farrant conspiring to fake a ghost story in his local press. Some were actually involved, namely Nava Grunberg and Kenny Frewin. Others were present and heard Farrant conspiring with Hill to deceive the press and public. Hill's wife and various visitors to the address, not least Farrant's girlfriend at the time, can attest to Farrant's charlatanry and shenanigans. Then there are Hill's secretly recorded tapes ...
Unsurprisingly, Farrant doesn't want to address any of these matters.
Deme, If you won't come over to Net Curtains, the Posse is gonna saddle up, lasso you and bring you there. We'll give the Manchester crowd just as much space as Farrant, so stop being a cry baby. What's the matter pardner? You scared?
BTW-You're getting your screen names mixed up again. You changed this back to Vampirologist - remember?
Unsurprisingly, The Demonologist will not respond to my questions. I guess he hiked his frock and ran away...
Hi YO!
Dear Demonologist,
Good Lord! You accuse Farrant of going after Manchester because he has nothing else to do in his life? My God, what incredible hypocrisy!!! You come here under an assumed name, level all types of abuse at Farrant, and if YOUR NOT Manchester, just what damned dog do you have in this "fight"? Go to any of Manchester's blogs and what do we find? Manchester under his assumed identity doing nothing but whining and sniveling and complaining about the "evil Farrant"! David Farrant OWNS Sean Manchester, that's what makes this little "soap opera" so entertaining.
Well, I will give David Farrant his due, Farrant has NEVER been afraid to speak his mind USING HIS NAME, while Manchester SLINKS around pretending he is unaware of all this. Well my friend ... I GOT YOUR NUMBER ... You better believe that .....
Don Ecker
(You all remember me don't ya? You know, that War-Mongering Yank?"
PS BTW, how is ol' Jackie "I'm a big assed Spider Vampire? Cooper?
Sean, you are more than welcome to come to Net Curtains and state your point of view. However, if you file one more false DMCA, I'm going to send a 100 pizzas and Jehovahs Witnesses to your house.
Re: "David Farrant Q & A: Top 10 Questions About Sean Manchester."
Seán Manchester was asked some time back why he does not discuss Farrant in broadcast interviews. He was asked because Farrant cannot give an interview without resorting to defaming the man he tried to emulate thirty-nine years ago. When Farrant's interloping was rejected he turned poisonous and the rest is history.
He answered: "How many times do you want to hear me utter the word 'false'? Everything you ask me which issues from that man will be met by the response 'false.' You can insert that word on my behalf, if you really must, to allegations made about me and mine; thus making my saying it superfluous."
Everything Farrant has to say about Seán Manchester, his family and his friends is malicious and totally false. What is the point in dealing with Farrant's claims in perpetuity? None of the answers Farrant gives to questions raised about Seán Manchester and his wife in the ten questions put to him are remotely true. The only person who could answer those questions is Seán Manchester. How would Farrant have the answers? Such answers he gives are merely seen by him as further opportunity to libel Seán Manchester and his wife.
What I find amazing is the obvious lack of intelligence in those who ask Farrant such questions and publish his defamatory untruths without requiring any evidence whatsoever for what is being claimed. Most people quickly deduce for themselves that Farrant is a depraved individual who is extremely vindictive and malicious. Journalists, police, juries, magistrates and the judiciary all arrived at the same conclusion when examining the evidence on this man. But they did, at least, base their judgement on actual evidence!
Farrant spits his venom for others to disseminate without a shred of evidence. Everything he says about Seán Manchester is rooted deeply in a festering pool of hatred.
Why, then, would anyone want to rely on, much less publish, anything this man has to say?
Why are you such a coward Deme? Net Curtains would love for you to post a rebuttal or a balancing comment on our blog.
Tell us about Sean's medal. David didn't give any information on that. The research was done independently.
Deme sez...... on and on ......
Farrant's evil yada..yada..yada.. Farrent defames the Bishop blah blah blah Farrent is depraved yada..yada..yada.. Farrant kills cats blah blah blah Farrent does things with women that I'd like to yada..yada..yada..
Hey Deme, you EVER THINK ABOUT CHANGING THAT SAME OLD TIRED RAP? Just a suggestion.....
Don Ecker
Post a Comment