In the interests of calming the general chaos and strife found in the comments sections of The Cat's Miaow, we are featuring free psychiatric counseling by Grigory Alekseev. Grigory is currently enrolled in a correspondence program in Psychology at Yaroslavl State University. (No, he's not a licenced counselor or even a doctor. What did you expect? That I'd pay a *real* doctor? Ha! Fat chance! Look. Stop complaining. At least I'm trying) 24 Octover
Greetings comradeskis. Please to bear with me english is not my language first. I am review material provide by Baldy Cat regarding to feud of Mr. David and Mr. Bunkers Bishop. I believe can I mitigate dysfunction here. On this blog I see many signs of what you call mad or perhaps cloud cuckoo-land behaviors but primary analysis may I confine to personalities argue in comments. I will analyse examples and give the feed you back.
"No wonder so many people feel sorry for you, but I feel no pity at all. You disgust me!" - say Mr. Anonymous
Mr. Anonymous very hostile. I suggest obtain small pet such as bird or squirrel and attempt develop empathy will be transferred to human being over time.
"If you are really so niave that you can't see this; then you are the one with a serious problem, not myself!" say Mr. David
Mr. David stop please your shouting. Peoples to feel put off. May be attempt to understand how other has feelings. Company of small animal such as bird can downcrease diastolic pressure of blood. Also help clean crumbs from table.
"At least i have the balls to post using my real name u hypocritical bell end." - say Mr. Craigbond
Mr. Craigbond refers to shape of human penis; with relation to curvilenear of bell. Not wholesome. Suggest company of woman or small bird.
"When I look at my comments, I'm astounded at my ability to enter into dialogue and then take over." -say Carrol
Mrs. Carrol it is good and healthy sign you look at comments by your own. You have strong view which is appropriate on planet outside present solar system. Thus communication is be impaired considerably. Also true, small pet (bird would be ideal) can obtain curb violence of speech and foster companion feelings similar to normal human.
Grigory
ригорий
33 comments:
I duuno. Getting some crackpot to analyse me Cat. You trying to tell me something?!
David Farrant
Don't be so judgemental, David. Grigory really is sincere. Look, I admit advising everyone to get a small bird may be a bit off the mark. But what do you expect for free counseling?
No, that's not off the mark at all Cat. I don't mind small birds actually.
David
See??!! He's doing good already!!
I was about to give him the sack, but now I think I'll keep him on as a regular guest.
this is great !--the Russian shrink --cracked me up...touche
I'ld say mr Baldry you got a gift for satire
I get sick of reading these on-going harsh arguments--actually I'm just skimming by these.....looking for lighter enjoyable comical things and then post on Daaaave
DAve....WHY do you keep arguing back ? My position is that a fire has to be "stoked" and you guys are doing a good job of that--a fire--no matter how intense will burn out eventually --if left to its self.
If you are right about what you claim--why do you keep trying to "prove" anything.....I wouldn't...I would just quietly bow out--and venture on to other business....I think this will ride into eternity
I had to come back here and look at the shrink's picture and then re-read everything....
THIS IS FRICKIN GREAT!!
I LAUGHED MY ass off !!
cut it out-even !! you guys have actual "mugs" for sale on Amazon ?!
with NO disrespect for BSM I do have to acknowledge that I have been totally hilariously caught off guard with the art and now the mug and the shrink...
pull down my bloomers will ya, I am laughing so hard..or I will pee in my pants !!!!!
I NEVER looked at the art work or the mug until tonight.....Baldry you should be a regular at the local comedy club /cafe !!
I gotta throw it to ya man, slap me a high FIVE !!!
Hey Borat,
You gave me a chuckle for once! Good job ;)
i agree with carol for once--a fire will burn itself out eventually if left unstoked but this is an addiction, pathalogical really--after all why should bonky care if david choses to go to hell in a handcart or not--why should he want to 'save' david if that is his aim-- he is like the spanish inquisition---'repent or else!'what are either of them trying to achieve? bonky no doubt thinks his place is safe in heaven but who would want to meet him there anyway--anyhow he is forgetting all the naughty bad things he has done--i know its annoying when people write stupid untrue stuff about you but i dont go on about robin hoods grave and lady armytage every day of my life,and sorry to mention it now as an example, i have many other interests and committments of a more rewarding type but i have to plug it now and then as these people are still at it,
so does bonky want to 'save' david from the burning fiery furnace--why is he still yammering on about who said what in about a non existent vampire in 1971?
if that isnt his Chrisian aim what does he want---david to say gosh bonky you are right and i was wrong, please forgive me a la catherine style? in other words his pound of flesh!
tata barbara
One person who will never allow the fire to die down is Barbara who blows on the smallest ember wherever she can find it until it is flaming up again.
The other, of coures, is Farrant himself who, when ignored, just continues from one year to the next stoking the flames of abuse.
What does Manchester want, asks Barbara? But it never crosses her mind to actually ask him. She much prefers to speculate on his behalf.
Manchester has made clear from way back that he wants nothing. Farrant is of no interest to him. However, if he, his family, friends and colleagues become the subject of Farrant's malicious attacks appropriate action is taken where necessary.
To stop this all Farrant has to do is ignore Manchester. I cannot see that happening because Farrant's entire life is centred on his hate campaign against Manchester. Every interview he gives, every publication he self-publishes, every blog he starts, all concentrate on defaming and maligning Manchester. Whereas Manchester has never mentioned Farrant in any interview he has given on radio or television since 13 March 1970 and even then it was to warn against action which Farrant took five months later that led to him being arrested.
Over the years Manchester naturally felt the need to set the record straight when Farrant made damaging claims through every media in existence, but has no desire to repeat what is historically a matter of public record. Farrant sees it differently and clearly wants to keep stoking the fire for as long as he possibly can. When that fire of Farrant's making dies down he fears he will have nothing in his life. It has not occurred to him to replace his perpetual abuse against one man with something else - something more constructive.
In the meantime, Farrant heaps innocent people's names and reputations on his pyre which still burns after decades.
Unlike Carol, I find none of this funny. I find it tragic, especially as people in America and the UK are exploiting the tragedy for their own personal gain and sick amusement.
i have been at the receiving end of manchesters claptrap and lies to know that he is a hypocrite of the highest order , a fantasist who sees vampires and giant spiders, sticks stakes into them , burns them on pyres , breaks into tombs and desecrates peoples dear departed relatives by opening their coffins --see his own fair screed in thv---etc and is just as addicted to the feud as david,who for the most part has been defending himself as manchester is the agent provocateur--they are like siamese twins, folie a deux,it is a malignant and pathalogical dependency, he could not even leave david out of his birthday party--see his blog
Can't you see, Barbara, that what you are doing right now is stoking the fire everyone is complaining about?
You have spent decades, Barbara, making unsubstantiated allegations about a man you met briefly by accident at a public event over two decades ago.
He wants nothing to do with you. Why do you want to keep involving yourself wherever his name appears? You have an obvious obsession and perhaps should seek some help.
You keep on repeating the same old nonsense across the web from one year to the next. It never ceases. When did Manchester last mention you, assuming he ever did? And if he did, I daresay it was only to talk about the Kirklees phenomenon.
Let it go, Barbara. It will make you iller than you already are.
"he could not even leave david out of his birthday party"
Look, Barbara, it is quite clear from reading that report that Manchester had no control over what people said during their after-dinner talks. The expression on his face when Hill was talking does not show any great delight in the fact that Hill made some references to Farrant. Hill was the only person to bring Farrant up in the after-dinner contributions. Nobody else did, as far as I can tell.
You really ought to get out more, Barbara.
HIGHLY FLATTERED!
"Hill made some references to Farrant. Hill was the only person to bring Farrant up in the after-dinner contributions. Nobody else did, as far as I can tell."
Bulldust! He went armed with long notes which both Bonky and himself obviously knew about beforehand.
Bonk's sumation of this 'speech' runs into hundreds of words, so the speech must lasted for ages.
But nevertheless, I'm highly flattered!
David Farrant
quite david--if someone did that while a guest in my house i would, as the person whose house it was, be held responsible for allowing a subject i wanted'nothing to do with' to go ahead and then publish the transcript!--also i dont understand why everyone else can write reams and reams of rubbish about this topic on a message board specifically dedicated to this loonytunes feud yet when i make one comment or offer a sensible observation
, bonky goes completely dickipoggy and carries on as if he wasnt the major culprit who started it--i thought that was what message boards were for--too near the mark eh bonky?
"He went armed with long notes which both Bonky and himself obviously knew about beforehand."
I would be fascinated to learn how the Hunchback knows that Hill's notes were "long" and how Manchester "obviously knew about them beforehand"? Was the Hunchback a guest and taking notes himself? If he was not present, how on earth would he know?
"Bonk's sumation of this 'speech' runs into hundreds of words, so the speech must lasted for ages."
Manchester has made no summation of Hill's after-dinner recollections of the days when the Hunchback slept in Hill's cellar and conspired to fake a ghost story in the press. Someone else did. It was just a brief report of Hill's contribution.
"But nevertheless, I'm highly flattered!"
Of course you are, Farrant, because for you there is no such thing as bad publicity. The only bad publicity to your mind is no publicity.
"if someone did that while a guest in my house i would, as the person whose house it was, be held responsible for allowing a subject i wanted'nothing to do with' to go ahead and then publish the transcript"
Get your facts straight, Barbara, before commenting on matters which do not concern you. Manchester did not "publish the transcript." Nobody did. Someone briefly covered the occasion and some of Hill's comments. I am sure Manchester does not censor what his guests want to say when they speak, even if you would. That does not mean he necessarily approves of the subject matter.
"i dont understand why everyone else can write reams and reams of rubbish about this topic on a message board specifically dedicated to this loonytunes feud yet when i make one comment or offer a sensible observation .............. etc."
Because, Barbara, IT DOES NOT CONCERN YOU. Can you not get that into your thick head? You have commented about Manchester and matters about which you know absolutely nothing hundreds of times already on countless blogs and boards. You have been doing it for donkey's years and it does not improve in the repetition. All you do is parrot the same old nonsense to win the Hunchback's approval. In other words, you return the propaganda you have received from the Hunchback and sometimes spam it all over the net. Everyone, bar the Hunchback, is thoroughly sick and tired of your bandwagoneering, Barbara. GET A LIFE ..... !
"Manchester has made no summation of Hill's after-dinner recollections of the days when the Hunchback slept in Hill's cellar and conspired to fake a ghost story in the press. Someone else did. It was just a brief report of Hill's contribution"
Quite Sean,
Just as you are pretending not to do now!
Or are you saying that some other 'guest' wrote this summary of the 'Egmanne's' speech on your own Message Board with your knowledge?
Well, which is it?
If someone other than yourself summarised 'Egmannes's' after dinner speech all about myself on your owm Message Board, perhaps you could tell us all how this could have happened Sean?
Well, we are all waiting . . .
Probably we'll all have a long wait, as usual!
David Farrant
it concerns me as much is it concerns any other member of the public who you invite to read your rubbish by publishing it and comment on, presumably-----also bonky wrote loads of rubbish about me and continues to do so, what i want to know is why bonky is so concerned about david's life and his immortal soul, bonky has shown clearly that he cannot live without his alter ego david!
barbara
That i9s one way of putting it, Barbara.
Without me apparently, his life would be just one empty chasm!
Can you imagine it seriously?
He'd be left with nobody to write about, think about or 'plot against' - his life would just be empty. Suppose I should be honoured to be held in such great esteem! Though only in a funny sort of way.
Its no honpur to be revered by lunatics - of which he is truly one!
David
"Are you saying that some other 'guest' wrote this summary of the Hill's speech on your own Message Board with your knowledge?"
First, it was not a speech. It was an after-dinner talk.
Second, it has not appeared on any message board. A brief summary appeared on the blog "In the Shadow of the Highgate Vampire" and that blogger's social network site. The blogger is not Manchester.
Third, the dinner party was attended by sufficient people for any one of them to have discussed it with others. But I am not about to enter into details of who was present and who was not. Perhaps the blogger who wrote the report was present? One thing is for certain, you were not present and could not know anything beyond the brief report you have read on someone else's blog.
"bonky wrote loads of rubbish about me and continues to do so"
You are a liar, Barbara. You provide no evidence to support your malicious allegations because you cannot. It does not exist.
"what i want to know is why bonky is so concerned about david's life and his immortal soul"
Quite simply, Barbara, he isn't. It is you and the Hunchback who are obsessed with Manchester. You cannot refrain from posting about him almost every time you boot up your computer. Manchester is not the slightest bit intereted in the Hunchback's life. Why should he be? He has a beautiful wife, lives in a beautiful part of the country and enjoys a full, varied and interesting life. What possible attraction would a down-and-out in Muswell Hill - someone he hasn't had contact with for decades - hold?
You seriously need to recharge your brain cells, Barbara, and do some thinking!
"Without me apparently, his life would be just one empty chasm!"
I find it strange how closely the Hunchback describes himself when attempting to malign Manchester.
Manchester has set the record straight on the Hunchback's interloping. There is no need for him to repeat it. Since March 1970, Manchester has not mentioned or referred to the Hunchback once when interviewed on radio and television. Take a look at the stream of pamphlets self-published by the Hunchback. They all carry defamation against Manchester. Just about every interview in every medium the Hunchback has given has also included calumny against Manchester.
Without Manchester the Hunchback would have had nothing to do each day for the past forty years other than drink alcohol and smoke cigarettes. He has been either unemployed or in prison. At least Manchester provided some purpose for the Hunchback and while he was concentrating on Manchester at least some others were being spared his lies and malice.
TIGHT LIPPED
"There is no need for him to repeat it. Since March 1970, Manchester has not mentioned or referred to the Hunchback once when interviewed on radio and television."
That must be another classic, Sean!
You see (as most people see) nobody has the slightesat interest in discussing myself in the terms you refer to.
Nobody! Excepting the 'bonky one' himself, of course whom you are more than acquainted with.
Be careful with that mirror you keep looking into. Supossed to be seven years bad luck to break one!
By the way, and on anothre matter, you still ding your ventriloquist puppet-act, Sean. Can't say I blame you if you've given that up now as people kept seeing your lips moving.
Still, there's always the saxaphone, I suppose!
David Farrant
i have loads of evidence mr nobody, in my files about all the rubbish manchester has accused me of! also loads of photocopies of all the derogatory pamphlets he wrote about david, and posted to me, before i even knew david--why did he do that?
also you are being malicious and politically incorrect by referring to david as 'hunchback'--many people have kyphosis or scoliosis of the spine, it is a medical condition--you may as well call someone blionf or deaf or parlysed as a term of abuse,
why for that matter are YOU so involved with manchester--what is it to do with you,GET A LIFE BOY--OR GIRLIE
"you are being malicious and politically incorrect by referring to david as 'hunchback'"
This is how you described Manchester yesterday, Barbara:
"also bonky wrote loads of rubbish about me and continues to do so, what i want to know is why bonky is so concerned about david's life and his immortal soul, bonky has shown clearly that he cannot live without his alter ego david!"
So, using the term "Bonky" which refers to mental disability is all right, but not a term which refers to physical disability?
Can you not detect the hypocrisy in your foolish comments, Barbara?
touche mr a, however two wrongs dont make a right as the saying goes, you are still wrong to call people hunchbacks or whatever, i will stop calling manchester bonky, which wasnt my invention and if it does mean at the end of the day he is mad, well, maybe david does have a stoop--i dont remember--you could always have a go at his crippled foot---but all disabilities mental or physical should not be used to poke fun,
barbara
The fact is you did use an abusive term when it suited you and the lot of you on here, except Demo and Carol, use the same abusive term whenever they say anything about Manchester.
So, while they do that, and let's face it they've been doing it for years, I shall stick with calling Farrant "The Hunchback."
I cannot take the credit, however, for using that term because it was actually coined by Carol who used it before me.
I suspect what's really getting under your skin, Barbara, is the fact that you know full well Manchester is not bonkers while Farrant is a foetally-hunched Hunchback and has been since he came into the world sixty-four years ago.
your comments are duly noted and inwardly digested--i find you a contemptible little twerp whoever you are, as for Bishop Manchester, you are dragging his good name in the mud everytime you post with your frightfully misguided--and lets face it-- extremely mysterious mission to be the bishop's Front of House person--i am surprised you have managed to master the complexities of the situation with so much information and knowledge and not cause the good bishop to correct you on a single point! but as he is too busy to bother his holy head with reading all this rubbish he would't know whether you are getting it right or wrong would he?
barbara
I don't have a "mission", Barbara, but you obviously do. Otherwise why would you keep posting about Manchester year in and year out? You haven't stopped since you first came into possession of a computer!
Manchester does not need to correct me in person because his published works are at my finger tips and much of these arguments are already archived online where anyone with half a brain can find them.
What I find truly mysterious, Barbara, is your willingness to talk behind Manchester's back for years and years, yet never once does it occur to you to talk to him. He has a blog for that purpose which people who want to defame him avoid like the plague because the last thing they want is to hear the plain, unvarnished truth.
You just want to be left alone to publish calumny about this man from year to the next. Others see this and weigh you up accordingly.
fiddlesticks!
do you believe everything you read?
"Without me apparently, his life would be just one empty chasm!"
The Hunchback describes himself in yet another attempt to misrepresent Manchester.
Why not put it to the test?
I propose the Hunchback removes all mention of Manchester from HIS life. He will not be able to do so because the Hunchback is parasite and Manchester is the unwilling host.
The Hunchback wouldn't last five minutes without his mentioning, misquoting, maligning and misrepresenting Manchester.
I dare him to put it to the test and prove me wrong.
"He has a blog for that purpose which people who want to defame him avoid like the plague because the last thing they want is to hear the plain, unvarnished truth"
Said "Anonymous" to Barbara.
Are you being serious "anonymous"?!
Yes. 'he' has a Blog, but if people answer any of his unfounded allegations on there, the replies just get deleted.
So in that respect, he hasn't got a Blog at all. Its just one massive screed against his perceived enemies, and he quickly deletes anyone telling the actual truth about his distorted allegations.
David Farrant
How does Farrant know that "if people answer any of his unfounded allegations on there, the replies just get deleted"?
Has he tried to ask a question and had it deleted?
No? I didn't thinks so.
I have been assured by the Bishop that only anonymous abuse will be deleted. Anyone who provides a genuine name to ask a genuine question will not be removed and will be addressed.
Post a Comment